MOJO
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Donate
Guardiany
October 9 2018

Not Proven – More Nonsense from The Guardian

Euan News

 

The Guardian (online) yesterday published this article on the recent decision at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, to uphold a civil claim against a man who had previously been acquitted, by a High Court jury, of rape.

The issue of rape complainers seeking damages notwithstanding acquittal of the accused at trial is arising with increasing regularity.  This trend serves, if nothing else, to illustrate the parlous position of those acquitted at trial who have, as things stand, neither closure nor confirmation of their innocence.

Where we take particular exception to the reporting of this case, however, is in the prominence given to misinformed opinion and, indeed, naked speculation masquerading as fact in the context of rape conviction statistics.

By way of example:

“Sandy Brindley, of Rape Crisis Scotland, said the rate of prosecutions and convictions for rape in Scotland was very low because of the need in Scottish trials for corroboration and the availability of not proven verdicts.”

Let’s leave aside the twin facts that corroboration is required, for very good reasons, in all Scottish trials, and that there are forms of corroboration available in rape trials in the absence of witnesses.  This oft-repeated old chestnut about not proven verdicts is nonsense.   If the Crown proves its case beyond reasonable doubt, it wins.  If not, the accused is entitled to be acquitted.  In any other jurisdiction the hapless recipient of a Scottish not proven would, by definition, be found not guilty.   The not proven verdict does not make it easier to secure an acquittal; the test of guilt is there to be met by the Crown.   What the not proven verdict does do is to stigmatise the innocent.

Here’s another…

“Women’s rights campaigners believe juries make heavy use of not proven in rape cases because they sometimes blame women for what happened or believe they share responsibility for sexual encounters.”

There’s no suggestion of an evidential basis for this belief, but in any event the scenarios envisaged don’t have any logical tendencies towards a not proven verdict that I can see.

It would be nice if supposedly serious journalism took these issues more seriously.   The uncritical echoing of empty mantras does not serve the interests of justice.

The Fallibility of Memory and The Importance of Evidence CCRC Chair Richard Foster’s Farewell Speech

Related Posts

BBITV

News

Birmingham Pub Bombings – Victim’s family sues alleged conspirator, and police

PA Media is today reporting that the family of Maxine Hambleton, who died in the Birmingham pub bombings, has issued writs for civil damages in connection with the attacks. Margaret Smith, Maxine’s mother, is suing Michael Patrick Reilly, who is alleged to be one of the perpetrators. She has also commenced civil proceedings against the […]

25

Events, News

Glasgow, 3rd June 2022

To complement the work of artist Anne Flynn and her popular, ongoing, miscarriage-of-justice focused exhibition in Glasgow’s Merchant City, on 3rd June we illuminated three public buildings in Glasgow with some less well-known truths about the Scottish Criminal Justice system and its egregious failings. The buildings we chose were the Tollbooth Steeple, the site of […]

18

Events, News

The System’s Grim

Running until Friday 10 June, an exhibition of original art commissioned by MOJO is being held in Glasgow Merchant City. The artist, Anne Flynn, is a recent law graduate who volunteers with MOJO and is closely engaged with our work. Her art powerfully portrays the lived experience, and the personal trauma, of miscarriage of justice […]

Latest Tweets

  • We reproduce this article by Samuel Osbourne from the Independant 30 May 2019. mojoscotland.org/carbon-credits…
    3 years ago
  • We reproduce here a worrying piece from the Guardian from 29 May 2019 by Sian Cain about austerity and it’s potenti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    3 years ago
  • There is a debate on going regarding the not proven verdict in Scotland. In an article from the Times, Gordon Jacks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    3 years ago
→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2022 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The MOJO Aftercare and Reintegration Project is financially supported by the Scottish Government The MOJO Advocacy and Education Project is financially supported by the Roddick Foundation