MOJO
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Donate
Guardiany
October 9 2018

Not Proven – More Nonsense from The Guardian

Euan News

 

The Guardian (online) yesterday published this article on the recent decision at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, to uphold a civil claim against a man who had previously been acquitted, by a High Court jury, of rape.

The issue of rape complainers seeking damages notwithstanding acquittal of the accused at trial is arising with increasing regularity.  This trend serves, if nothing else, to illustrate the parlous position of those acquitted at trial who have, as things stand, neither closure nor confirmation of their innocence.

Where we take particular exception to the reporting of this case, however, is in the prominence given to misinformed opinion and, indeed, naked speculation masquerading as fact in the context of rape conviction statistics.

By way of example:

“Sandy Brindley, of Rape Crisis Scotland, said the rate of prosecutions and convictions for rape in Scotland was very low because of the need in Scottish trials for corroboration and the availability of not proven verdicts.”

Let’s leave aside the twin facts that corroboration is required, for very good reasons, in all Scottish trials, and that there are forms of corroboration available in rape trials in the absence of witnesses.  This oft-repeated old chestnut about not proven verdicts is nonsense.   If the Crown proves its case beyond reasonable doubt, it wins.  If not, the accused is entitled to be acquitted.  In any other jurisdiction the hapless recipient of a Scottish not proven would, by definition, be found not guilty.   The not proven verdict does not make it easier to secure an acquittal; the test of guilt is there to be met by the Crown.   What the not proven verdict does do is to stigmatise the innocent.

Here’s another…

“Women’s rights campaigners believe juries make heavy use of not proven in rape cases because they sometimes blame women for what happened or believe they share responsibility for sexual encounters.”

There’s no suggestion of an evidential basis for this belief, but in any event the scenarios envisaged don’t have any logical tendencies towards a not proven verdict that I can see.

It would be nice if supposedly serious journalism took these issues more seriously.   The uncritical echoing of empty mantras does not serve the interests of justice.

The Fallibility of Memory and The Importance of Evidence CCRC Chair Richard Foster’s Farewell Speech

Related Posts

Guildford 4

News

Birmingham bombings inquest whitewash repeated at Guildford

The decision by the coroner at the Birmingham bombings inquest to exclude from scrutiny the very matters that might have allowed the victims’ families some degree of closure – a decision that also denied justice to Paddy Hill and the other unwitting victims of the atrocity – rendered that exercise effectively pointless and, depending on […]

3990

News

Prisoners denied access to forensic evidence in bid to prove their innocence

For miscarriage of justice victims looking to overturn their wrongful convictions, one of the most significant challenges they encounter is the refusal of police and Crown to allow access to crucial evidence that could fatally undermine the case against them. From The Guardian online yesterday (10 July), we reproduce an interesting article that highlights this […]

community

News

MOJO Community Project Launches

The MOJO Aftercare and Reintegration Team are pleased to report the successful, long-awaited launch of our MOJO Community Project. The MOJO Community is an extension of our client-led reintegration programme which aims to bring clients together to seek to mitigate the consequences of wrongful imprisonment and to offer an alternative to commonly encountered feelings of […]

Latest Tweets

  • We reproduce this article by Samuel Osbourne from the Independant 30 May 2019. mojoscotland.org/carbon-credits…
    4 years ago
  • We reproduce here a worrying piece from the Guardian from 29 May 2019 by Sian Cain about austerity and it’s potenti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    4 years ago
  • There is a debate on going regarding the not proven verdict in Scotland. In an article from the Times, Gordon Jacks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    4 years ago
→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2023 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The work of MOJO is financially supported by the Scottish Government