MOJO
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Donate
Megrahi
January 19 2021

Lockerbie Appeal Refused

Euan Comment, News

In a decision that surprised no-one, the Appeal Court on Friday (15 January) refused the latest appeal against the conviction of Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi for the Lockerbie bombing in 1988.   Mr Al-Megrahi died in 2012.

The case had been sent back to the Appeal Court by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, who were satisfied that an appeal was merited on two distinct grounds.

One of those grounds was that “no reasonable jury, properly directed, could have returned a guilty verdict” on the evidence heard.  This was, in itself, a remarkable development.   There was no jury in the trial, where the verdict of guilty was reached by three senior Scottish judges.  The startling import of the referral by the SCCRC was that three senior Scottish judges had delivered a verdict that was outwith the bounds of reason.

Much has been made, and is being made, of the Appeal Court’s rejection of that argument.  It is widely interpreted, and presented, as an endorsement of the trial verdict, a re-affirmation of the correctness of that verdict, and confirmation of Mr Al-Megrahi’s guilt.  It is nothing of the sort.

To understand this, you need to understand the role of the Appeal Court in hearing the appeal.   Their task was simply to rule on a loaded question.  That question, to be clear, was whether a reasonable jury could have reached a guilty verdict.  Not whether a reasonable jury would, or should, have reached it.   These alternatives would require examination of the objective correctness of the verdict, in the face of the evidence heard.  The question addressed by the court was not whether the verdict was correct, but whether it could be justified on any basis.   It is not for the Appeal Court to substitute its own view of the evidence for that of the jury (or, in this case, the three senior judges); its task is simply to determine whether the guilty verdict was a possible outcome.  

This is a reversal of the notional “benefit of the doubt” afforded to an accused person at trial, by the equally notional presumption of innocence.  At appeal, the benefit of any doubt goes to the prosecution. 

When you consider that reality, it becomes clear that the test to be met in challenging an unreasonable verdict is so high as to be almost impossible to satisfy.  The court hearing the Al-Megrahi appeal recognised this, and said so.  But to be clear, the Appeal Court did not say, either expressly or by implication, that the guilty verdict in this case was the correct verdict.  That was a question they simply didn’t have to address.

There are, in the view of this organisation, huge doubts about the legitimacy of this conviction.  The recent decision by the Appeal Court may have legitimised it as a matter of law, but as a matter of justice the doubts remain, unresolved and undiminished.   In that sense, the decision tells us what we already knew – that “law” and “justice” are not the same thing.   We have to find a way for our law to be the servant of justice, in its essential form.  The opposite is currently true.

Just £10,000 paid out to victims of wrongful conviction in two years Edinburgh Conviction Referred to Appeal Court

Related Posts

BBITV

News

Birmingham Pub Bombings – Victim’s family sues alleged conspirator, and police

PA Media is today reporting that the family of Maxine Hambleton, who died in the Birmingham pub bombings, has issued writs for civil damages in connection with the attacks. Margaret Smith, Maxine’s mother, is suing Michael Patrick Reilly, who is alleged to be one of the perpetrators. She has also commenced civil proceedings against the […]

25

Events, News

Glasgow, 3rd June 2022

To complement the work of artist Anne Flynn and her popular, ongoing, miscarriage-of-justice focused exhibition in Glasgow’s Merchant City, on 3rd June we illuminated three public buildings in Glasgow with some less well-known truths about the Scottish Criminal Justice system and its egregious failings. The buildings we chose were the Tollbooth Steeple, the site of […]

18

Events, News

The System’s Grim

Running until Friday 10 June, an exhibition of original art commissioned by MOJO is being held in Glasgow Merchant City. The artist, Anne Flynn, is a recent law graduate who volunteers with MOJO and is closely engaged with our work. Her art powerfully portrays the lived experience, and the personal trauma, of miscarriage of justice […]

Latest Tweets

  • We reproduce this article by Samuel Osbourne from the Independant 30 May 2019. mojoscotland.org/carbon-credits…
    3 years ago
  • We reproduce here a worrying piece from the Guardian from 29 May 2019 by Sian Cain about austerity and it’s potenti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    3 years ago
  • There is a debate on going regarding the not proven verdict in Scotland. In an article from the Times, Gordon Jacks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    3 years ago
→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2022 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The MOJO Aftercare and Reintegration Project is financially supported by the Scottish Government The MOJO Advocacy and Education Project is financially supported by the Roddick Foundation