MOJO
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Donate
Prisoner
January 7 2019

Systemic Bias Against Prisoners Who Maintain Innocence

Euan News

We publish, below, a recent press release from Progressing Prisoners Maintaining Innocence (PPMI), following on a meeting, arranged by them, at the House of Commons on 10 December:

Some 60 people met at the House of Commons on 10th December to review the problems faced by wrongly convicted prisoners, ex-prisoners maintaining innocence, and their families. Highlight of the meeting was a vigorous discussion about how best to improve the efforts made to recognise their situation in jail, and after release, and how to improve attitudes in the legal profession. 

The meeting was attended by solicitors and other legal professionals working in the field, and representatives of groups campaigning for justice for wrongly convicted prisoners, ex-prisoners maintaining innocence and the families of prisoners.   

The meeting opened with four presentations by Dean Kingham (Parole Board lead solicitor for the Association of Prison Lawyers), Dr. Ruth Tully (a forensic psychologist specialising in the field) and two ex-prisoners who had each served a decades-long prison sentence while continuing to maintain innocence.   

A lengthy and robust discussion followed.  The many difficult issues raised included –

·        the patronising indifference of the legal and prison systems to the claims of innocence from convicted prisoners

·        the assumption that every conviction is correct in fact as well as in law

·        the specific penalties inflicted on prisoners for denying guilt, including longer sentences

·        the huge problems prisoners claiming innocence have coping with frustration

·        the need for prison psychologists to accept that some prisoners have been wrongly convicted, and respond accordingly

·        the failure of the system to recognise that there are a significant number of individuals in prison whom are innocent and were wrongly convicted

·        the expensive pointlessness of the CCRC which refuses to investigate possible miscarriages, and claims it cannot do so

·        the dire shortage of legal aid after conviction

·        the failure of the legal system to disclose unused evidence to prisoners. 

The meeting concluded that the undeniable evidence of systemic bias against prisoners who maintain innocence needed serious attention at the highest level. 

A question posed to Dean Kingham was whether the Parole Board was fit for purpose? He gave a robust talk indicating the faults within our system primarily rest with the Justice Minister, the Ministry of Justice and Parliament. He gave a number of pertinent examples. 

Without any specific or justifiable reason, spending years more in prison after expiry of the sentence was vigorously condemned. Furthermore, the consequences of wrongful convictions had proven costly to the public purse, and to the individuals and their families – an aspect of wrongful convictions which ought to concern all tax-payers. 

The consensus view of the meeting was the need to address these issues seriously, and at the highest legal and political levels. Such executive action was long overdue. 

The meeting was organized by ‘Progressing Prisoners Maintaining Innocence’

For more information please email: ppminnocence@gmail.com.

Website: prisonersmaintaininginnocence.org.uk

How does it feel to be wrongfully accused? UK Supreme Court Refuses Hallam/Nealon Appeal

Related Posts

20250222-_13I1004

Comment, News

‘People think you come out … and live happily ever after. If only.’ The reality of life after wrongful conviction

We at MOJO were delighted to collaborate recently – in a small way – in important research being undertaken by Dr Faye Skelton and her colleague Dr Mandy Winterton. Dr Skelton is Associate Professor in Forensic Cognition and Miscarriages of Justice at Edinburgh Napier University. More than that, she is a highly informed and respected […]

Lockerbie.jpg.gallery

Comment, News

The Bombing of Pan Am 103

The final episode of the BBC’s six-part series on the aftermath of the Lockerbie bombing aired last night. Across the six episodes of what was a production on a grand scale, what we saw was an approach to the Lockerbie tragedy from a perspective not much examined in the millions of words that have been […]

1Q9A0176-Edit

News

Calls for Eddie Gilfoyle case to be reviewed

From The Justice Gap, 19 May, we reproduce the following article concerning our friend and fellow-traveller, Eddie Gilfoyle. Regular visitors to this website will be familiar with the egregious miscarriage of justice suffered by Eddie, still un-corrected. The Justice Gap article adds new and depressing detail to Eddie’s story. There were renewed calls last week […]

Latest Tweets

→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2025 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The work of MOJO is financially supported by the Scottish Government and by the Roddick Foundation