MOJO
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Donate
UKSC3
January 30 2019

UK Supreme Court Refuses Hallam/Nealon Appeal

Euan News

The UK Supreme Court has today decided, by a majority of 5-2, to refuse the appeals of Sam Hallam and Victor Nealon against the Government’s rejection of their claims to compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment.

Current legislation provides that compensation is only payable where it can be shown that exoneration, on the quashing of a wrongful conviction, resulted from the production of fresh evidence which proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant did not commit the offence.  It’s not enough that you were wrongly convicted, and imprisoned, for a crime of which you are subsequently cleared.

Mr Hallam and Mr Nealon argued that this conflicts with, and offends against, the presumption of innocence, as that is (theoretically) guaranteed by Article 6 (2) of the European Convention on Human Rights.  

Their position, in simple terms, is that where an accused person has been found not guilty – whether at trial or at subsequent appeal – their presumption of innocence should subsist.  This is a position with which we entirely agree, as will be apparent to anyone who has read our previous articles on this subject.

The UK Supreme Court, in its judgement today, finds no such conflict.  In consequence, we can see that, in reality, your presumption of innocence is stripped from you at the point of accusation.   If you want it back, you have to prove it.   That doesn’t appear, to us, to be much of a presumption at all.

Paddy Hill has today made the following comment:

If the Police can take you from your home and family
depriving you of your life and liberty without consequence then no one
is safe. I have said it for many years. This can happen to anyone. Don’t
wait till it happens to one of your own before you asks questions about
what is done in your name to innocent people. Compensation does not give
you your life back but it is a recognition of the wrong done to you by
the state. For the state to renege on this shows our courts, and the
Lords responsible for this judgement have no interest in justice, or
basic common decency. Innocent men and women who are wrongfully
convicted get none of the support they require from the state. They want
to brush us under the carpet. We are the guilty secret at the heart of
the failure of the British Judicial system. It is no surprise that our
fight goes on for justice.

Systemic Bias Against Prisoners Who Maintain Innocence Innocent, Jailed and Uncompensated

Related Posts

11

Comment, News

Crimes Without Consequence

Those of you who follow this site, or our social media, will be aware of our friend Jimmy Boyle. Some will know something of his story. Convicted and imprisoned as the result of false and malicious allegations, Jimmy was eventually to secure what passes for justice. But not until the system had extracted from him […]

Guildford 4

News

Birmingham bombings inquest whitewash repeated at Guildford

The decision by the coroner at the Birmingham bombings inquest to exclude from scrutiny the very matters that might have allowed the victims’ families some degree of closure – a decision that also denied justice to Paddy Hill and the other unwitting victims of the atrocity – rendered that exercise effectively pointless and, depending on […]

3990

News

Prisoners denied access to forensic evidence in bid to prove their innocence

For miscarriage of justice victims looking to overturn their wrongful convictions, one of the most significant challenges they encounter is the refusal of police and Crown to allow access to crucial evidence that could fatally undermine the case against them. From The Guardian online yesterday (10 July), we reproduce an interesting article that highlights this […]

Latest Tweets

  • We reproduce this article by Samuel Osbourne from the Independant 30 May 2019. mojoscotland.org/carbon-credits…
    4 years ago
  • We reproduce here a worrying piece from the Guardian from 29 May 2019 by Sian Cain about austerity and it’s potenti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    4 years ago
  • There is a debate on going regarding the not proven verdict in Scotland. In an article from the Times, Gordon Jacks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    4 years ago
→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2023 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The work of MOJO is financially supported by the Scottish Government