MOJO
  • Home
  • News
  • About
  • Contact
June 28 2017

Disclosure Failings Outlined in New Report

Euan Uncategorized

Disclosure Failings Outlined in New Report Raise Miscarriage of Justice Concerns

Police and Crown Prosecution Service disclosure failings outlined in a new report increase the risks of miscarriages of justice occurring in criminal cases, according to legal charity the Centre for Criminal Appeals. The CPS Inspectorate report’s findings also underpin the need for greater access to police files following a conviction in order to ensure unsafe convictions can be corrected, according to the Centre.
The report, published yesterday, found that in 40.7% cases, police did not fully meeting their disclosure obligations – up from 38.5% in 2015.

In criminal cases, the law requires that the CPS to hand over to the defence any material that may undermine the prosecution case or assist the defence case. The study found that in only 56.9% of cases prosecutors fully complied with this ongoing duty. Where sufficient disclosure does not happen, miscarriages of justice can result.
The main police disclosure failings uncovered by the report included the police failing to reveal the previous convictions of witnesses, an issue discovered in 10.1% of cases.
Other disclosure failings including the police listing items gathered during the course of their investigation wrongly, providing poor descriptions of them, or failing to provide a list of such material altogether.
Commenting on the report, the Centre for Criminal Appeals’ Managing Director Suzanne Gower said: “The disclosure failings exposed by this report are deeply concerning to anyone who rightly expects our justice system to ensure innocent people aren’t wrongly imprisoned. The report also shows the need for greater transparency from the police and CPS. We frequently find our ability to investigate miscarriage of justice cases is hampered by not being able to access their documents even after conviction. In much of the United States, police files and prosecutor files on a case become a matter of public record once a conviction is made. In England and Wales we are far less transparent – and it is miscarriage of justice victims who lose out as they are prevented from being able to prove their innocence.”

This Press release issued by the Centre for Criminal Appeals, 27 June 2017, 14:45

Criminal Charges Against 6 Over Hillsborough Further Forensic Fudging Facts

Related Posts

peter-sunny

Uncategorized

Sonia “Sunny” Jacobs

MOJO are sad to learn of the passing of Sunny Jacobs. Sunny was a former death-row inmate, who along with her late husband Peter, also exonerated, were successful campaigners who founded the Sunny Centre, a retreat for victims of miscarriages of justice, in Ireland. We were privileged to work with Sunny, alongisde Peter, with our […]

1Q9A0176-Edit

News, Uncategorized

Patrick Joseph Hill

Born 20 December 1944, Belfast, N. Ireland Died 30 December 2024, Ayrshire, Scotland On 30 December, with great sadness we shared the news that our founder and director, Paddy Hill died peacefully, cared for by his wife Tara at their home in Ayrshire – Paddy determined to leave hospital to be home in his last […]

<p

News, Uncategorized

Ex-prisoner’s cry for help over indefinite jail term before his death

The Independent has today published an article which, whilst dealing with English law, highlights a major weakness in how we do justice in Scotland also. The article, which we publish below, draws attention to the appalling consequences of a failed experiment introduced by section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (with effect from 2005) by the […]

Latest Tweets

→ Follow us

Archives

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Comment
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Notice
© Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Scotland) 2025 - Company No SC239555 - Registered Charity No SC033820 The work of MOJO is financially supported by the Scottish Government and by the Roddick Foundation